Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Oregon Law Practice Management

Practice Management Tips for Oregon Lawyers

Oregon Law Practice Management

Main menu

  • Home
  • Upcoming CLE
  • On Demand CLE and eBooks
  • Services
  • About
  • Contact

Tag Archives: client trust account

What to do with Client Funds that Net Interest

Posted on 11/28/2016 by beverlym
1

Client funds that can earn net interest must be placed in an interest-bearing trust account for the benefit of the client. Oregon RPC 1.15-2(c).  Here are the logistics:

Type of Account

Typically, an interest-bearing account would be established for a particular client or matter.  However, the rules also permit a “pooled” account provided there is a subaccounting allowing for computation of interest earned for each client.  Oregon RPC 1.15(2)(c)(2).

FDIC Coverage

Whether pooled, separate, or in a traditional IOLTA account where the interest is paid to the Oregon Law Foundation (OLF), client funds are subject to FDIC insurance limits.  The client’s insurance is applied to the aggregate of the client’s funds in the institution.  For example:

Client has $100,000 in a lawyer trust account at Bank A.  Client also has a personal account at Bank A with a balance of $200,000.  The client’s FDIC insurance is capped at $250,000, leaving $50,000 uninsured.

If you are holding substantial sums in trust for clients, it may be necessary to open more than one trust account.  It is also prudent to remind clients of the aggregate FDIC insurance limits.  See Sylvia Stevens, “Trust Accounts and the FDIC: Protecting Client Funds in Uncertain Times,” Oregon State Bar Bulletin.  [Note: At the time this article was written, FDIC coverage was capped at $100,000.  It is currently $250,000 per depositor.]

Can a Client Waive the Right to an Interest-Bearing Account?

Absolutely.  OSB Formal Opinion 2005-117 makes this clear.  However, when interest is waived, the client is, in essence, making a charitable donation to the OLF. Because charitable donations have tax consequences, OSB Formal Opinion 2005-117 lays out two possible paths:

If You DO NOT Give Tax Advice:

  1. Inform the client there may be tax implications to waiving interest.
  2. Tell the client to seek independent tax advice before proceeding.
  3. Suggestion: confirm the client’s decision in writing.

If You DO GIVE Tax Advice:

  1. Inform the client there may be tax implications to waiving interest.
  2. Give the client the necessary tax advice.
  3. Get informed consent in writing. [The opinion states that lawyers who give tax advice may have a self-interest conflict under Oregon RPC 1.7(a)(2) which triggers the need for informed consent pursuant to Oregon RPC 1.7(b).]

What Should You Do?

If you determine that a client’s funds can net interest:

  1. Let your client know how much income they can expect to receive less the expenses you are permitted to deduct under Oregon RPC 1.15-2(d).
  2. Inform the client that she may also waive the right to interest and keep the funds in your IOLTA account.
  3. Inform the client that you cannot advise her on the tax implications of waiving interest.
  4. Recommend the client seek independent tax advice before proceeding.
  5. Talk to the client about any FDIC insurance issues that may apply.
  6. Ask the client to confirm her decision in writing (a reply to your email is sufficient).

Logistics of Setting Up a Separate Interest-Bearing Account

A separate interest-bearing account should be identified as “Lawyer Trust Account for [Client Name].”  Use your social security number or Federal ID number to set up the account.  You, the lawyer, should be the authorized signatory. ORPC 1.15(2)(c)(1).

Interest on this account will be reported under your name on a Form 1099-INT issued by the bank. YOU, the lawyer, must in turn issue a Form 1099-INT to the client to reflect the pass-through of interest.  See Tips, Traps, and Resources: “1099 Reporting Penalties,” In Brief (September 2015).

All Rights Reserved 2016 Beverly Michaelis

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Ethics, Financial Management, IOLTA | Tagged 1099, 1099-INT, Beverly Michaelis, client funds, client trust account, ethical, Ethics, FDIC insurance limits, IOLTA, lawyer trust account, net interest, Orego RPC 1.15-2, Oregon law practice management, OSB Formal Opinion 2005-117, pooled account | 1 Reply

Commingling and Lawyer Trust Accounts

Posted on 03/30/2015 by beverlym
Reply

Most lawyers are keenly aware of the prohibition against commingling personal funds with IOLTA funds.  However, this does not mean that a lawyer is never allowed to deposit the lawyer’s own funds into the IOLTA account.  In fact, there are a number of occasions when a lawyer is allowed to do so:

  1. Paying bank service charges (lawyer may deposit a nominal amount of lawyer’s own funds to offset reasonably anticipated bank charges) Oregon RPC 1.15-1(b); OSB Formal Opinion 2005-146.
  2. Meeting minimum balance requirements (lawyer may deposit lawyer’s own funds in an amount necessary to meet that purpose) Oregon RPC 1.15(b).
  3. To cover credit card merchant fees (in an amount necessary to meet that purpose) OSB Formal Opinion 2005-172.
  4. To cover chargebacks when a bank/credit card company claws back disputed funds previously deposited in trust.  If the lawyer has already removed the funds as earned when the dispute is submitted to the credit card company, other clients’ money will be taken from trust. The lawyer is obligated to replace that money with his/her own funds.  OSB Formal Opinion 2005-172.
  5. To process credit card proceeds.  In cases where a lawyer’s bank insists upon a single merchant account for processing credit cards, “It is not a violation of Oregon RPC 1.15-1 to deposit all credit card transactions into a trust account, if the portion representing earned fees is promptly transferred to the lawyer’s business account.”  OSB Formal Opinion No. 2005-172.  In other words, if a lawyer is using a single merchant account, which must be a trust account under OSB Formal Opinion No. 2005-172, that merchant account will receive some deposits which are retainers or unearned fees and costs and some deposits that are earned fees (the lawyer’s own funds).  The latter is not considered commingling provided the lawyer promptly transfers the earned fees from trust.
  6. To return disputed fees.  If a lawyer bills a client, takes the fees, and the client later disputes the lawyer’s bill, the lawyer is no longer required to replenish the trust account but the lawyer may if he/she wishes.  OSB Formal Opinion 2005-149. (Replacing the funds will necessarily come from the lawyer’s own pocket since the lawyer previously removed the earned fees from the trust account.)
  7. To rectify an error when the lawyer removed funds from the IOLTA account by mistake.  For example, lawyer writes a check on the IOLTA account when the check should have been written on the business account.  The lawyer is obliged to correct the error and replace the funds.  [More on this below.]
  8. To correct mathematical errors involving the IOLTA account.  For example, lawyer discovers that deposits and disbursements were wrongly entered in the columns of a spreadsheet or accounting program.  The lawyer is obligated to correct the errors, and if needed, replace any missing client funds.  [More on this below.]
  9. To make a client whole if client funds are removed as the result of cyber breach, scam, fraud, or embezzlement.  The lawyer is obligated to make her clients whole. By necessity, the lawyer will be replacing client funds with funds that belong to the lawyer.  [More on this below.]

What Happens When a Mistake or Loss Occurs?

Lawyers are obliged to correct mistakes or losses and make their clients whole (examples 7, 8, and 9 above).  However, taking corrective action does not absolve the lawyer of possible discipline action.  Lawyers are accountable for the underlying circumstances that resulted in the mistake or loss.  If those circumstances constitute a violation of the ethics rules, the lawyer may be subject to discipline.

When Is a Lawyer Obliged to Report a Mistake or Overdraft to the Bar?

Oregon RPC 1.15-2(l) provides:

Every lawyer who receives notification from a financial institution that any instrument presented against his or her lawyer trust account was presented against insufficient funds, whether or not the instrument was honored, shall promptly notify Disciplinary Counsel in writing of the same information required by paragraph (i). The lawyer shall include a full explanation of the cause of the overdraft.

Thus, lawyers are only required to report errors that result in overdrafts of their IOLTA account.

[All Rights Reserved 2015 Beverly Michaelis]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Ethics, Fees, Financial Management, IOLTA | Tagged Beverly Michaelis, client trust account, lawyer trust account, mathematical errors, Oregon law practice management, Reconciliation, Recordkeeping, trust funds | Leave a reply

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,029 other followers

Recent Posts

  • Amazing Handheld Printer
  • Washington Amends Lawyer Marketing Rules to Permit In-Person Solicitation
  • Legal Research Companies Casemaker and Fastcase Merge

Archives

Categories

Twitter

  • This order is #sowrong #CapnCrunch should be #number1 #NationalCerealDay twitter.com/kdka/status/13… 13 hours ago
  • RT @mmpadellan: Today, and every day, should be Stacey Abrams Appreciation Day. She literally saved the day. 1 day ago
  • RT @mychal3ts: You can never go wrong saying “Thank you, Stacey Abrams” 💜 https://t.co/2dB3jxYsAu 1 day ago
Follow @OregonBev

Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn

For Oregon Lawyers

  • MBA
  • OADC
  • OCDLA
  • OSB
  • OTLA
  • OWLS
  • PLF

National Resources

  • ABA LAW PRACTICE DIVISION
  • ABA LEGAL TECH CENTER
  • IPHONEJD
  • LAW TECHNOLOGY TODAY
  • MASS LOMAP
  • RIDE THE LIGHTNING
  • THE MAC LAWYER

RSS Feed

RSS Feed

On Demand CLE and eBooks

Instagram

Come on #spring
Love the new patio @schillingsgardenmarket 😁 Thank you for the cool dwarf 🌲 today!
Great day to hike in #shevlinpark 🥾 🌲 ☀️
Blog at WordPress.com.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Our Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: