It’s hard to categorize the annual “60 in 60” tips session at ABA TECHSHOW because it could be anything – useful websites, new apps, career resources, gadgets, editing and proofreading tools for lawyers, or anything else the panelists find that we can’t live without. Below is a sample of what was covered this year. For the complete list, view my story on Wakelet.
The short list from 60 in 60
TimeFlip – a battery-powered cardboard polygon that uses an app on your smartphone to track time spent on meetings, phone calls, email, and other tasks.
Dryver – the mobile app where you can hire a driver starting at $15.95/hour to drive you around in your own car.
Ceev.io – the free Chrome extension that uses your LinkedIn profile to create a resume. Here’s mine. Choose from four themes, nine accent colors, and five different fonts at no charge. Unlock more options for $10. My tip: also consider Strikingly, which allows you to create a website using your LinkedIn profile.
Sideways Dictionary – a site that demystifies tech babble like “sandboxing” or “honeypot,” which have nothing to do with kids playing or bears eating honey.
PerfectIt – an intelligent editor and proofreader with a special style sheet specifically designed for lawyers. $99 a pop, integrates with Microsoft Word. Check out the free trial.
Flow-e – an email and task management platform combined to transform your inbox into a highly visual task board (Kanban style) or Sanebox, which automatically filters unimportant email out of your inbox (works with Gmail, Office 365, Apple iCloud, etc.).
There’s so much more … like how to create your own digital medical exhibits
Hopefully I’ve tempted you. Check out the complete list from 60 in 60! Where else will you learn how to validate websites, determine if your passwords have been compromised, use private browsing, convert your blog into a podcast, check Google trends, or mute calls using your Apple watch?
Did you answer “yes” to one or more of these questions? You are in good company!
As we discussed in 7 Steps to Building Better Client Relationships, lawyers often feel pressured to practice “door law.” The source of the pressure may be economic: I don’t really have a choice because I need the money. Or it can be emotional: Family, friends, or former clients are depending on me.
Either way, saying no can be incredibly difficult, so here is some sage advice that first appeared in In Sight.These tips apply no matter who is doing the asking: clients, friends, family, or neighbors.
Five steps to saying “no”
Be respectful. Listen to the asker and don’t interrupt. Respect the request, then respect your right to decline the request.
Keep it simple. You have the right to say “no.” Elaborate justifications aren’t necessary [and may lead to backsliding, since many of us say “yes” to avoid feeling guilty].
Assign responsibility elsewhere: “That sounds very nice; unfortunately, my
calendar is booked solid.” Now it’s your calendar’s fault. Stand firm. Avoid engaging in discussion or negotiation.
Refer to others who might fill the opening well.
Say yes when there is a good reason to do so, it will benefit you, or the cause is one you believe in. [Life is too short to take on a case or client you find repugnant.]
You are not the only lawyer who can help your clients.
If money is an issue, there are other lawyers who participate in the OSB modest means program, offer sliding fee services, or take pro bono referrals. If you continually give your time away to nonpaying clients, your practice will decline and you may need to close your doors. If you close your practice, you aren’t available to help anyone.
If the case can’t be won, are you doing a service or a disservice by taking it?
Once a lawyer commits to a case, many clients assume the case CAN BE WON, no matter how you qualify your representation. Not all clients have a legal remedy, for a variety of reasons. This can be a bitter pill to swallow, but the truth is better than false hope. You can always suggest [and should suggest] a second opinion.
A good case and a paying client don’t necessarily mean the case is right for you.
Don’t let someone push you out of your comfort zone. Law is complex. Staying on top of your desired practice areas is hard enough. Straying into unfamiliar areas is stressful, time consuming, expensive (because of the learning curve), and more likely to result in a claim or bar complaint.
You are a lawyer, not a doctor.
Keeping clients who won’t follow your advice, don’t cooperate, and look to place blame anywhere but with themselves, is a pure misery. This is not a situation you can cure, except by firing the client.
In law, negotiations between parties can end in a win-win for both sides or they can break down and leave your client further from their objective. It’s a delicate dance that requires a clear understanding or your client’s needs and desires as well as those of the opposing party.
A recent NW Sidebar posts highlights these tips for negotiating effectively:
You can’t focus on your client’s goals if you don’t know what they are. Negotiation is a serious subject. If possible, meet with your client in person. Be open to what the client has to say, but be prepared to curb his expectations.
If there are boundaries you feel you can’t cross, speak up.
Identify and verify lienholders and others who may have third-party rights to settlement proceeds.
Compile your costs to date (and likely future costs).
Use this information to discuss the difference between gross and net settlement values. Give concrete examples.
Allow the client time to think even if it appears you’ve come to a mutual understanding about how to proceed.
During negotiation, keep the client informed. Technically, it may not be necessary so long as you are operating within your settlement authority. However, keeping the client involved will give her a better picture of the overall process.
Don’t stop at confirming agreements with opposing counsel. Confirm the client’s consent to settle in writing! Let the client know the likely ETA of the settlement proceeds and what the disbursement process will involve (for example, waiting for a check to clear). Provide a written settlement accounting. A sample settlement accounting and checklist is available on the PLF website. Select Practice Management > Forms > Litigation.
In Cox v. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., 2017 WL 4640452 (E.D. Wash. Sept. 19, 2017) (unpublished), the plaintiffs sought to disqualify the opposing law firm based on a conflict of interest. One of the plaintiffs argued that he was a former client of the firm on a substantially related matter, necessitating the law firm’s withdrawal.
The plaintiff’s contact with the firm was as a representative for a corporation. In concluding that no attorney-client relationship existed between the plaintiff and the law firm, the court relied on two key points:
The law firm and corporation executed a written engagement agreement that identified the corporation (and not the individual) as the client in the matter.
The plaintiff failed to introduce contradictory evidence, i.e., he could not point to any communication or action by the firm which expanded the attorney-client relationship to include him individually as a client.
As we discussed in the CLE, Limiting Exposure to Conflicts, identifying your client and clarifying the client’s status (prospect, current client, or former client) is paramount to conflict screening and limiting your potential liability. The single best tool at your disposal? Written engagement, disengagement, and nonengagement letters – all of which are available at the Professional Liability Fund website.
But the law firm inCox didn’t stop at the engagement letter. Firm members were also consistent in their actions toward the corporate representative. There was no evidence of emails, correspondence, or other communication supporting that the corporate representative was an individual client of the firm.
The moral of the story? A solid engagement letter is a small investment to make in the realm of thwarting conflicts and liability. Even better: maintaining consistency in your corporate communications.