Court notices delivered via email are a known point of vulnerability for law firms: failure to timely check messages, accidental deletion of court notices, or haphazard review of spam folders.
Now The Researching Paralegal reports on the latest variation of this theme.
A trial court clerk in Florida served an order by email awarding a significant amount of attorney fees to the prevailing party (appellee). The opponent/appellant claimed it did not receive the order, resulting in its failure to file an appeal. What happened? The opponent/appellant’s email system automatically deleted the court’s email as spam.
The opponent/appellant asked the court to vacate the original order on the grounds of excusable neglect. The trial court declined and Florida’s First District Court of Appeal affirmed. The Researching Paralegal cites these factors:
First, the review of the court clerk’s email logs confirmed that the email with the court’s order was served and received by the law firm’s server. Second, the law firm’s email configuration made it impossible to determine whether the firm’s server received the email. Third, the law firm’s former IT specialist’s advice against this configuration flaw was deliberately rejected by the law firm because its alternative cost more money.
The trial court concluded the law firm made a conscious decision to use a defective email configuration merely to save money, which was not “excusable neglect.”
Another nail in the coffin was testimony by the appellee’s attorney. His firm assigned a paralegal to check the court’s website every three weeks to safeguard that his firm would not miss any orders or deadlines. The court held that the appellant had a duty to check the court’s electronic docket.
Emerald Coast Utilities Authority v. Bear Marcus Pointe, LLC, Case No. 1D15-5714, Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 1st Dist (2017).
What can we learn from Emerald Coast?
- Whitelist important email. Set your spam or junk email filters to allow receipt of messages from approved senders or domains. Include courts, administrative agencies, key clients, opposing counsel, and any other senders whose email you don’t want to miss.
- Review spam quarantine summaries daily. Aggressive spam filters will occasionally block senders and domains you have added to your whitelist if the filter finds content in the email to be possible spam. Addresses and domains may also change, causing new notices to be marked as spam.
- Don’t forget to look at your junk mail folder, another place where legitimate messages can land.
- Check online court dockets. Weekly will work for most firms; others may need to login daily, depending on case volume.
- Listen to your IT staff. Here, the IT specialist argued against automatic deletion of junk and spam messages and recommended hiring a third-party vendor to handle spam filtering. He also suggested investing in an online backup system, another idea rejected by the law firm. Following either of these recommendations may have prevented the firm from missing the deadline.
A few more takeaways
- It should be clear, but just in case: everyone needs a backup system. If you can’t afford the cost of an online subscription, buy an external hard drive on sale and use the backup utility built into your operating system. For backup protocols and additional backup options, see How to Backup Your Computer from the Professional Liability Fund (Practice Management > Forms > Technology).
- Can’t afford a third-party vendor for spam filtering or another IT task? Understandable, but the work itself still needs to get done. This may mean you, your partner, or your staff. Technology is a tool, not a substitute for human judgment.
There are some other interesting twists and turns in Emerald Coast. For example, the law firm also refused to join in on a motion for a case management conference – a step that would have likely revealed the existence of the attorney fee award. Additionally, automatic deletion of spam wasn’t the only email configuration procedure that caused problems for this office. If you have a few moments, read the full opinion here.
Beverly Michaelis – All Rights Reserved 2017
Pingback: Year in Review | Oregon Law Practice Management
Pingback: Revisiting eFiling Tips | Oregon Law Practice Management