Posted by: beverlym | 01/25/2012

ABA TECHSHOW 2012

ABA TECHSHOW® 2012

March 29-31, 2012 – Chicago

Don’t miss the world’s leading legal technology conference and expo

Created by and for lawyers and legal professionals!

  ABA TECHSHOW 2012 Highlights: 

  • More than 60 educational sessions (Three days of CLE!)
    • Tablets
    • Paperless Office Practice
    • E-Discovery
    • Virtual Law
    • Cloud Computing
    • Social Media
  • Two-day technology expo featuring over 100 vendors
  • Product information sessions
  • Law firm discounts

Save on Registration Fees:

  • Use the Professional Liability Fund Program Promoter Code EP1211 to receive an exclusive discount on the standard registration rate.  For more details, visit the PLF Web site > News.  TECHSHOW registration opens October 1, 2011.
  • Be an “Early bird” and save another $200 if you register in February 2012.  Visit the ABA site for details.
  • Multiple attendees from the same firm may qualify for even deeper discounts using a “SuperPass.” 
Posted by: beverlym | 01/23/2012

Trust Accounting for Paralegals

Next month I am scheduled to speak to Law Office Management students at Portland Community College.  My subject: Trust Accounting.

So what do paralegals and other legal staff professionals need to know about Trust Accounting?  If you are a non-lawyer should you accept responsibility for balancing the trust account?  Should you sign trust account checks?  (If permitted by your jurisdiction.)  These are just a few of the questions I’ll be answering.  Here is a sneak preview:

Copyright 2012 Beverly Michaelis

Posted by: beverlym | 01/17/2012

Setting Up a Practice: Cautions and Pitfalls

In February Dee Crocker and I will present “Setting Up a Practice: Cautions and Pitfalls” at the University of Oregon Law School in Eugene.  Our topics include how to manage trust funds, deadlines, and conflicts of interest.  Fortunately, there are cheap/low-cost solutions for all these needs and we’ll share those insights with students and recent law grads.

Here is a preview:

Copyright 2012

Posted by: beverlym | 01/04/2012

2011 in Review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The concert hall at the Syndey Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 34,000 times in 2011. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 13 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

Posted by: beverlym | 01/03/2012

Salaries for Legal Support Staff

In the latest issue of the Multnomah Lawyer, the Multnomah Bar Association published the 2011-2012 Legal Support Staff Salary Survey:

The survey is prepared annually by Legal Northwest, Staffing Partner to the Multnomah Bar since 1996.  Legal Northwest recruits for paralegals and legal secretaries in all areas of the law as well as receptionists, file clerks and litigation support staff.  MBA Members receive discounted pricing on direct hire positions and also receive a quality of service guarantee. In addition a 3% contribution is donated to support MBA activities.

Finding quality support staff depends, in part, on paying a competitive wage.  If you’re looking to hire in the greater Portland metropolitan area, check out how your proposed salary stacks up.

Posted by: beverlym | 12/27/2011

FAQ – Law Practice Management, Part 2

Last week I answered some frequently asked questions about law practice management.  In today’s post, I am addressing a few more:

Conflicts of Interest – Prospective and Declined Clients

Question

Am I required to track prospective and declined clients in my conflict of interest system?

Answer

We recommend that prospective and declined clients be included in your conflict system.  For example, assume a husband comes in for a consultation because he is contemplating divorce. During the consultation, the husband discloses confidential information. The husband then decides not to proceed with the divorce, or you decline the husband as a client. Two years later, the wife comes in seeking a divorce. If you accept the wife as a client, you will have a conflict of interest. This could happen easily if you forget about the consultation with the husband and do not maintain a record of consultations in your conflict system.

Conflicts of Interest – Tracking “No Show” Lawyer Referral Clients

Question

What should I do if the bar refers a potential client to me and they are a “no show?”  Or the potential client never calls?  Do I still need to include the non-client in my conflict system?

Answer

A piece of advice before I answer the conflict question:  If the bar refers a potential client to you and the potential client does not call, inform the bar so you can get another referral.

Now, with regard to your conflict system:  You are not required to include names of potential bar referral clients who never call you.   The same is true of a “no show” who fails to keep a scheduled appointment (unless you learned confidential information about the client or her matter in the course of setting up the meeting).

Regardless, tracking “no calls” and “no shows” might prove helpful:

Joe Smith is referred to you by the bar for a divorce.  Joe is a “no show” for his appointment.  Other than knowing the adverse party’s name (Marie Smith), you have no information about Joe’s divorce.  Because Joe did not keep his appointment and you possess no confidential information about the matter, Joe may not appear in your conflict system.  Time passes.  Marie Smith calls.  You want to represent Marie.  Can you see the value of having an entry in your system documenting that Joe was a “no show” and did not keep his appointment?  Joe was never your client and your entry proves it.

Or assume a slightly different scenario.  Jane is referred to you by the bar.  You schedule an appointment for the next day.  Jane doesn’t show.  Six weeks later, Jane calls again.  As part of your regular conflict screening process, you run Jane through your system and see that she did not keep her last appointment.  This might be useful information to have in deciding whether to schedule Jane for a second meeting.

Keeping Declined or Miscellaneous Client Records

Question

What should I do with the notes or nonengagement letters I’ve accumulated for persons who don’t become clients?

Answer

If you are paper-based

Keep a yearly declined or miscellaneous clients folder.  For example: ”2011 Declined Clients.”  In the folder, staple together your intake sheet, notes, a copy of your nonengagement letter, and anything else you have from your meeting with the declined client.  This is cheaper than opening a file folder for everyone you meet.  Paperwork pertaining to declined clients can be kept chronologically within each year’s file.  Keep these records at least 10 years, as you would actual client files.  (For File Retention Guidelines, visit the PLF Web site.  Select Practice Aids and Forms > File Management.)   Always return any original documents provided by the client and remember to add declined clients to your conflict system.

If you are paperless

Create a file folder on your computer called “Declined Clients” and create subfolders for each year.  If you like, you can create further subfolders for each declined client.  Otherwise, generate a PDF file for each declined client and save the PDF under the declined client’s name.  In the PDF, assemble copies of your intake sheet, notes, and nonengagement letter or e-mail.  Scan any paper related to the declined/miscellaneous client and append it to the PDF.  Store your electronic records at least 10 years.  Be sure to capture your declined client folder in your backup.  Always return any original documents provided by the client and remember to add declined clients to your conflict system.

Unlawful Practice of Law

Question

What  should I do if I believe someone is engaged in the unlawful practice of law?

Answer

If you believe someone is engaging in the unlawful practice of law, report it to the Oregon State Bar.  A complaint form is available here.  On its Web site, the Oregon State Bar provides the following information:

“The UPL committee has authority to:

  • Dismiss a complaint
  • Send a notice letter, warning that the accused’s activities could be considered the unlawful practice of law
  • Issue an admonition with the consent of the accused
  • Enter into a cease and desist agreement with the accused or
  • Recommend to the OSB Board of Governors that the OSB file a lawsuit against the accused to prevent him from continuing to practice law without authorization.

Occasionally, if an investigation suggests that there has been some illegal activity that the UPL committee cannot address, then the UPL committee will forward the results of its investigation to other state bars, to the Oregon Attorney General, or to another appropriate regulatory agency.”

Copyright 2011 Beverly Michaelis

Posted by: beverlym | 12/20/2011

2011 Oregon Legislation Alerts

The 2011 Legislation Alerts issue of In Brief is now available on the Professional Liability Fund Web site.  Read about changes in 15 practice areas including:

  • Business Law
  • Civil Procedure / Judicial Administration
  • Commercial / Consumer / Landlord-Tenant Law
  • Construction Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Family and Juvenile Law
  • Health Law
  • Labor / Employment Law
  • Land Use
  • Real Property
  • State Bar Organization
  • Taxation
  • Torts
  • Workers’ Compensation

Some bills pertain to more than one practice area.  Practitioners should review all sections of this issue.

The new legislation takes effect January 1, 2012, unless otherwise noted.

Posted by: beverlym | 12/19/2011

FAQ – Law Practice Management, Part I

Law practice management advisors specialize in fielding questions.  Here are a few recurring ones that have been posed to me in recent months:

Conflict Procedures

Question:

If our firm purchases practice management software, is it necessary to continue routing new client intake forms to all the attorneys to review for possible conflicts?

Answer:

Yes!  It is important to circulate new matter information to all lawyers and staff in the office.  Ask that everyone review new matters for possible conflicts that may not be in the conflict system.  Someone in the office may recognize a conflict that would not be detected otherwise.  This can be done by routing new client intake forms or sending a firm-wide e-mail.  In either case, circulate the new matter information on a weekly basis.

Time Entries for Contract Work

Question:

I recently completed a contract project for another lawyer.  She is asking for time entries to include in the client’s billing statement.  Is there a particular format I should follow?

Answer:

Bill the lawyer as if you are billing the client directly.  Most clients want to see the following for each billable activity:

  • Date
  • Matter
  • Description of work performed
  • Time spent
  • Amount due (hours spent x hourly rate)

Give the lawyer the same information.  Remember that every time entry, and every bill for that matter, should tell a story.  An easy way to accomplish this is to  remember the “three W’s:” who, what, and why.

  • “Who” are the parties or persons involved in the activity.
  • “What” is the actual billable activity.
  • “Why” is the reason for spending the time to complete the task (For example: in preparation for trial or in response to a discovery request.)

Here are some more do’s and dont’s:

DO’s

  • Use results-oriented verbs to describe your billable activity:  “Attend hearing in response to Defendant Smith’s objection to attorney fee award,” or ”Prepare Plaintiff’s First Request for Production to Defendant Jones.”
  • Be as detailed as possible.  Don’t just say “Review documents,” describe the documents you reviewed: “Review documents, including [then list some of the key documents].”
  • Use present tense rather than past tense.
  • Be consistent in your phrasing.

DON’Ts

  • Don’t repeat the same phrase over and over again:  “Review discovery,” “Review documents,” “Review medicals.”
  • Do not use “etc.”
  • Avoid abbreviations the client won’t understand.
  • Avoid acronyms (which no one understands).
  • Weigh the formality of your language.  Should you say “memo” or “memorandum?”  “Fax” or “facsimile?”  “Telcon” or “Telephone conference?”  Many clients prefer a more formal approach when it comes to billing.   In either case, see the last bullet point under “Do’s.”

Third Party Payments

Question:

We have a case where an advance deposit was paid by a third party (not the client).  The work is now complete and there are funds remaining in trust.  To whom do we issue the refund?  We do not have a written fee agreement with the client or the third party.

Answer:

This issue is addressed in the Oregon State Bar Fee Agreement Compendium, available as part of BarBooks:

“A lawyer must deliver funds requested by a client ‘which the client is entitled to receive.’ Oregon RPC 1.15-1(d).  If the client is not entitled to the funds, the lawyer may be civilly liable to the payor for conversion or otherwise.”

I don’t have a bullet-proof answer for you, but here are two suggested approaches:

Option 1

Render a final bill to your client reflecting the balance remaining in trust.  Inform the client via the bill or in a covering letter or e-mail that you will be processing and issuing a refund to the third party within [some number of days] of the billing date.  Wait the stated number of days, then process the third party refund.

Option 2

Prepare a final bill reflecting the proposed refund to the third party.  Submit it to the client for her approval.  Process the refund after you receive your client’s consent.

Lesson Learned

The best course for this type of arrangement is to enter into a written fee agreement which specifies to whom any prepaid, but unearned fee is to be refunded.  Remember:

  • Billing statements sent to third parties should be redacted to protect client confidentiality or obtain client consent to disclose detailed billing information.
  • Third party payment arrangements are subject to Oregon RPC 1.8(f) – the client must give informed consent and the paying party cannot interfere with the “lawyer’s independence of judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship.”

Also see Avoid Serving Two Masters: Take Care in Accepting Payment from Someone Other Than Your Client and The Pushmi-Pullyu Resolving Third-Party Claims to Client Funds.

Copyright 2011 Beverly Michaelis

Posted by: beverlym | 12/12/2011

Gift Ideas for the Lawyers on Your List

Here are some excellent ideas for the lawyers on your gift list from fellow law practice management advisor Diane Ebersole of the State Bar of Michigan:

Jim Calloway and Sharon Nelson have created the 49th edition of the Digital Edge podcast in the gift giving spirit of December.  The lively banter discusses a wide variety of tech items and gadgets both useful and fun in a wide price range that may help you with your December purchases.  In addition to their podcast, the list of show notes provides a links of all the items discussed. 

Reid Trautz, Chair of ABA Techshow 2012, has also issued his annual Holiday Gift Guide for Lawyers.  This list also provides some product comparisons and purchase advice.  If you are looking for gifts in the productivity, food or just plain fun categories, check out Reid’s list for some great ideas. 

One more excellent list which provides a compilation of shopping ideas is Attention, Shoppers: A Lawyer’s Gift Guide from the folks at Attorney At Work.  In addition to looking at the list, take a minute to read some of the posts on this site whose motto is ‘one really good idea every day.’ 

Thank you Diane!

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers